Re: DUTCH OPEN/ASSEN 2009 - Here we go again!
Πέμπτη, 4 Ιουνίου 2009 11:33 πμ
The IDSF and the WDC are competitors. They both want more couples, money, power, or whatever. The same goes for your local supermarkets. The supermarkets operate in a free trade environment, so do the IDSF and WDC. There is only one big difference with the situation the supermarkets are in.
The supermarkets are run by business people who understand how business works. Supermarket 1 will never go to Supemarket 2, write down all the names of their competitor's customers and then tell them they can't enter their store because they've been to the competitor's! all customers would go away.
There is however a company that does, Microsoft. MS virtually restricts it's customers from any software from it's competitors. MS can do that because it was in a monopoly position.
In our tiny dance world this is happening: The IDSF is presented a monopoly position by the dancers themselves.
In The Netherlands the IDSF quickly scared the majority of couples from going to Assen 2007 and leaving us with only IDSF competitions, by threatening us with suspention. Even Sambaman, who says he wants Assen to continue to be the Most Specacular Dance Festival In The World, didn't dance in Assen because of the thread. Only 12 Dutch standard and 24 latin couples danced Assen 2007. Last year, 2008 that was 6 standard and 11 latin!!! In 2006 (before this mess) it was 31 and 35 Dutch couples dancing Assen (only counting the open amateur standard and latin).
What happend is that the IDSF first thread the couples with suspention if they would danc in Assen 2007. The result was 80% of the standard and 70% of the Dutch latin couples running away scared as hell. Now having been given the monopoly, the logical step for the IDSF was to actually ban Assen in 2008 and suspend all couples that did compete. Just because those 80% and 70% said it was OK. And it bloody works!!! Only 20% standard and 30% Dutch latin couples are left of the entries in 2006............
So in other words; we as dancers are responsible for what happens in our world, the IDSF and WDC are nothing without us, the dancers, who compete in their competitions.
WE decide to wich supermarket we go to (the cheapest, the closest, or the best). WE decide which competition we want to dance!!
I can NOT understand how dancers, who are given the choice between Assen and a few IDSF's of inferior quality, choose for those few IDSF comps in the 6 months after Assen!!!?? (a lot of the couples not going to Assen because of the suspntion didn't even dance all or any IDSF's)
Let this be clear. I believe the WDC has the wrong goals, but uses the right means to get there and the IDSF has the right goal, but the wrong means to get there. I don't fall for the WDC's freedom crap, there is little future there IMO. I do go for the opportunities (and money) the IDSF strives to create in the road they have chosen to follow. But is Ronaldo suspended by the FIFA, if he plays a game of football with the club in his hometown? Even if that club doesn't do doping tests, pay contribution to the FIFA or use the same rules? I don't think so!!!
DANCERS, SUPPORT DANCING AND DANCE IN ASSEN 2009, STOP THE IDSF'S ILLEGAL RESTRICTIONS BY IGNORING THEM.
Register for Assen under a different name if you have to. That is not against any rule of the IDSF not the WDC and will frustrate the IDSF administration when it wants to suspend.
I wish you all a nice set of big balls and CU in Assen!!
Joost Offermans, The Netherlands
|