Re: Mr Maxwell stands down as IPDSC President
Πέμπτη, 3 Σεπτεμβρίου 2009 12:56 μμ
A couple of things spring to mind with this and other information.
Two persons left the IPDSC (well, many more as a matter of fact), but two persons in important seats. My information is that IDSF wants the IPDSC to dissolve at the end of the year.
Finally a wise decision!
The failing of IPDSC to become the leading professional organisation could be a good lesson for IDSF. Whatever the reasons, the professionals do prefer the WDC and every dancer who pursues a complete career wants to finally and ultimately be World Champion within the WDC.
That, in the light of the open market strategy of the WDC, NOT using bans or punishing to keep the competitors under control and within, but allowing free choice, should convince even the blind that WDC is given authority by the dancers themselves. And authority is not something you can claim, it is given, or not given. WDC is given the authority by the professional dancers without any form of pressure.
This cannot be said of IPDSC or IDSF. They claim authority; they claim to be the superior organisation, and not even because of what they are, but because of the Olympic Recognition! Deriving their superiority from a third, external organisation and confuse this with authority!
That attitude is built on use of power, not on authority. And power used will wair off.
And what do we see?
More and more amateurs discover that there is a world next to IDSF and leave this organisation or at least challange her authority over their careers. Mind you, many would like to give IDSF authority over amateur-dancing! But in the current situation, where IDSF is demanding it, abusing rules and persons alike, they do not deserve it in the eyes of a large majority.
In the current situation IDSF could take a major step and solve the unwanted predicement they brought to the danceworld as a whole:
1. Dissolve IPDSC
2. Make an agreement with WDC, dividing clearly professional and amateur interests.
3. Work together to unite ther dancing
4. Put an end to banning and punsihing and the abuse of powers by national bodies.
That would not be too difficult would it?
This moment is an opportunity in time of limited length. If IDSF would decide to still ignore WDC and built up an inside professional organisation, this opportunity is lost for a long time.
Just stop the train at the nearest station and meet with WDC.
As far as I know there is still an open invitation from WDC to talk!
It would put a stop to doing everything twice or even more times.
It would put a stop to involving competitors in a political argument.
It would mean taking responsibility for the dancing and the poor couples involved in it.
What would be the loss???
Kindest regards,
Geronimo
|